Engagement measurement review
A twelve-working-day reading of your current in-app events, a sample of sessions, and a written account of what those recordings can and cannot say about engagement.
Read the scopeKuala Lumpur · in-app engagement analytics
The events you already collect still have to describe a person staying.
Toolkit Meadow reads in-app engagement analytics with product pairs in Kuala Lumpur: inventories, session samples, and a written account of what the current recording set can honestly support.
A review, not a login
Toolkit Meadow is a small studio on Demo Avenue that takes in-app engagement analytics as a craft: naming what a person did, noticing when a name no longer matches the screen, and writing that down so the next release does not inherit a polite fiction.
We work with product managers, researchers, and the engineer who owns the event list. The flagship booking is an engagement measurement review. Adjacent sessions cover event naming, a week of cohort extracts, and watching the first days after a feature ships.
They sat with our add-to-bag event and showed it was firing on a preview screen. After that, the weekly engagement conversation stopped treating a ghost tap as interest.
Lina, grocery app, Petaling Jaya
What you can book
Each engagement is a conversation and a written artefact. We do not sell a monthly analytics product.
Event naming session
A half-day table session that rewrites the in-app event names a new teammate would actually understand next quarter.
Read the scope
Cohort reading
Five consecutive mornings spent reading one week of extracts with you, so retention talk is tied to named screens instead of a single curve.
Read the scope
How the week actually feels
Most teams already log taps, screens, and a handful of “success” events. The difficulty is knowing whether those names still describe engagement after the last three releases. We sit with the inventory, watch a sample of sessions, and write down what the current recording set can and cannot support.